EU elections kick off against a backdrop of China disputes, ‘greenlash’ and possible Trump return

CNBC takes a look at why this election matters for Europe and the rest of the world.

European Union lawmakers and officials widely cheered the election win of U.S. President Joe Biden back in 2020, seeing it as a new dawn in the transatlantic relationship. Up until that point, European officials had been significantly challenged by the previous administration, under Donald Trump, which had imposed trade tariffs, disagreed over climate pledges, and shocked mainstream politicians with its combative style.

The future of the transatlantic relationship is still uncertain as U.S. voters go to the polls in November and it remains to be seen if Biden will remain in the White House or if Trump will return.

But regardless of what happens, the EU has learned an important lesson: It might not be able to rely on the U.S. for defense in the future. Trump has previously remarked that he would not protect NATO countries from Russian attacks if they lag on their membership payments. In addition, U.S. lawmakers took several months to approve new financial aid for Ukraine, raising questions about their long-term commitment to the cause.

As such, the next policymakers in the EU are expected to increase spending and work more closely with themselves on defense matters.

The European Commission, the executive arm of the EU, is expected to announce new tariffs on Chinese EVs just days after the election takes place.

The EU has been walking a tightrope regarding its links with China.

One the one hand, Brussels recognizes Beijing as a strategic rival, but at the same time, it wants to keep cooperation on climate matters and geopolitical issues.

In the wake of the 2019 EU elections, the bloc claimed it was the global champion on a climate-friendly agenda. However with more climate-skeptic politicians due to arrive in Brussels, expectations are that the bloc will ease some of these previous ambitions.

“The shift to the right in the EU Parliament would only facilitate a slowing down of further environmental legislation and potentially even the watering down of existing agreements such as phasing out conventional cars by 2035,” analysts at Citi said in a research note in late May.

“This could include more support for nuclear power or even support fracking for cheaper and more reliable gas,” they added.

In the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Kyiv applied to become a member of the European Union and official negotiations could start as early as this month.

Though this process will likely take many years before it is concluded, it is already posing the question of how much the EU will have to change to accept Ukraine and other new members.

There’s a general sense that the EU will have to adopt qualified majority to get things done rather than looking for the usual consensus. This would mean taking decisions without the need for unanimity as it becomes more challenging with increased member states.

Citi analysts also said that with Ukraine potentially joining the EU, there could be a “large shift in net contributions,” which would likely upset countries that are currently net receivers from the EU budget.

“An even larger Eurosceptic representation is also likely to weigh against bold reforms which could make enlargement difficult,” the analysts said.

A European-wide survey showed in March that citizens see the economy, social justice and jobs as the most important dimensions for the future of Europe.

This is particularly important at a time when the bloc is still recovering from an inflation crisis that dominated most of 2023.

Goldman Sachs said in a research note in May that the EU faces three structural issues: A deteriorating demographic outlook, a weak industrial investment in comparison with the United States, and low productivity growth.