China’s online ‘Kim Kardashian’ banned for being too ostentatious

An influencer nicknamed “China’s Kim Kardashian” for his extravagant outfits and displays of wealth has been banned from Chinese social media networks along with dozens of others who bragged about splurging on luxury goods.

The abrupt online disappearance this week of Wang Hongquanxing, who once boasted he never left home in jewellery and clothes worth less than Rmb10mn ($1.4mn), is part of the government’s latest campaign to maintain its dominance over China’s vibrant social media culture.

Wang and the other influencers, known for their short videos, were banned by multiple Chinese social media platforms, including Weibo, Douyin and Xiaohongshu after the internet regulator announced a drive against “creating ostentatious personas”. Profile pages for Wang, whose real name is Wang Hongquan, were declared inaccessible due to “violation of self-discipline” rules. 

“This is a highly visible spectacle that reminds people of the authority’s power,” said Carwyn Morris, assistant professor of digital China at Leiden University. 

For the Communist party government, the crackdown had the advantage that many would see it as ethically justified, he said. “It is likely that many people do see this sort of content as vulgar, particularly during an economic slowdown,” Morris said. “So this conduct makes the authority seem more moral and upstanding in their actions.”

China’s economy grew at an annual rate of about 5 per cent in the first quarter, but analysts say other indicators show real conditions are tougher than the headline figures would suggest, making the authorities even more sensitive to any sources of possible discontent.

The campaign started in April, when the Cyberspace Administration of China, the internet watchdog, announced it would curb behaviour such as “deliberately showcasing a lavish lifestyle built on wealth”. 

Internet platforms responded last week by vowing to crack down on “extravagance and waste” and “ostentation and materialism”. 

“Once materialism starts spreading, it can have a bad influence on teenagers . . . Hence this trend of luxury on the internet needs to be stopped,” state media Beijing News wrote on Wednesday. 

The 31-year-old Wang had 4.3mn followers on Douyin, China’s version of TikTok, Chinese online magazine Sixth Tone reported. He would appear online dripping with jade and pink diamonds and once boasted he owned seven luxury apartments in Beijing.

Other influencers also banned included “Sister Abalone”, a middle-aged wealthy socialite who gave her more than 2mn followers online tours of her palatial Macau homes, and “Mr Bo”, a luxury goods junkie with nearly 3mn followers.

Showing off his purchases of high-end fashion, Mr Bo carried his dogs around in designer bags, Chinese news website The Paper reported, and for his 25th birthday bought a customised Rolls-Royce Cullinan.

Travelling first class, he shopped at luxury stores around the world, obsessing over Hermès products in particular, according to state news outlet Hongxing News. 

Beijing’s campaigns to control social media figures date back at least to 2012, when it shut down the accounts of popular opinion leaders, said Luwei Rose Luqiu, an associate professor at Hong Kong Baptist University. 

More recently, China’s regulators have regularly rolled out “Clear and Bright” campaigns to purge the internet of trends they find reprehensible.

In 2021, authorities targeted celebrities and their armies of fans. A year later, they purged more accounts in the name of protecting youth from cyber bullying and other evils. 

But according to the China Media Project, a research group, Beijing made clear in 2022 that its real aim was to control online behaviour ahead of a national congress in October that year at which President Xi Jinping won an unprecedented third term as party general secretary.

“The goal in carrying out the special action . . . is to protect the party’s 20th National Congress,” the China Media Project quoted senior Cyberspace Administration official Zhang Yong as saying in March 2022.

Last year, the campaigns cracked down on “gender antagonism” — code for feminism — and on “class antagonism”, described by the China Media Project as a curious target for a party long led by Mao Zedong, a champion of class struggle.

Baptist University’s Luqiu said this year’s campaign against luxury influencers was aimed at asserting control over the emergence of independent internet personas. The “Clear and Bright” campaigns rarely affected state-backed personalities.

“The focus has shifted to grassroots internet celebrities . . . to strengthen control of the internet due to the concern about losing the ability to control public opinion and the behaviour of the people,” Luqiu said.

Leiden University’s Morris said managing short video content had become increasingly important for Beijing as the medium grew in popularity. 

A report by the official China Internet Network Information Center in March showed nearly 98 per cent of Chinese internet users watched short videos, while just under 76 per cent used conventional web browsers. 

The latest crackdown, however, has drawn a mixed response, with some championing influencers such as Wang — a sponsor of charities who is liked for his forthright style — and others criticising them.  

“Internet celebrities are already pretty boring, and flaunting wealth just makes them even more annoying,” said one online commenter. 

But another said Beijing’s efforts to conceal conspicuous consumption would not make poverty disappear.

“It’s hilarious — it turns out [the government’s] method for solving the wealth gap is to blindfold the poor so they can’t see it,” said one popular post on the question-and-answer website Zhihu. 

Wang’s assistant did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Sister Abalone’s agency and Mr Bo could not be reached.